After entering the
Nativity Church in Bethlehem, walk to the area to the right of the
altar and take the stone steps down to the underground grotto. There you
will find Jesus
' birth spot, emblazoned by a metal
starburst. But is this really Jesus
' birth spot?
In the late 19th century, British engineers digging around the church's
pillars to study their sturdiness accidentally discovered the mosaic floor
(on display in the church) of a 1st century church that is about six feet
above this starburst. Since 1st century barns weren't in basements, this
cannot be Jesus
' birth spot.
The precision (or the lack thereof) of the birth spot in Bethlehem aside, staring at this
starburst did lead me to think about the person whose birth this spot is supposed to
mark, and reminded me of the "Lord, Lunatic, Liar" argument that forced me to revisit my
atheism a few years ago:
The Bible records Jesus making three claims about himself (see John 1:1 and
John 8:58):
"I am God."
"I made the universe."
"I have been alive forever."
Before jumping to conclusions, the theoretical possibilities first had to
be considered. Taken as a set, these three claims could only be true or
false.
If the claims are
true, then Jesus is who he claimed to be - God or
LORD.
If the claims are
false, but
Jesus
sincerely believed them
to be true, then he
is a
LUNATIC.
If the claims are
false, Jesus knew them to be false
and was being
insincere, then he is a
LIAR.
C.S. Lewis, the Englishman who reasoned as above indicated that the
unprecedented nature of Jesus
' claims precludes any other possibility.
In particular, Jesus could not have been just a wise sage or a prophet because
wise sages or prophets by definition can't make such preposterous claims.
I tried hard to think of a fourth option to put Jesus back
in the corner as just a wise sage. Having failed, I then spent 9 months looking for
evidences in favor of Jesus having been a lunatic (it seemed the least-worst
option of the three for me) and/or the Bible to be false.